Reflections after meeting 2

It was interesting to document our own teaching facilities and reflect about how the layout and the furnishing of a room can influence the way we interact. This was not entirely new to me but it is always valuable to be reminded that the physical environment is a factor that can have an impact on students’ learning.  When choosing and studying a traditional classroom, as I did, it becomes apparent how its design and layout creates a certain atmosphere among its users. Immediately as you enter the room, it indirectly sends signals as what to expected from teachers and students. Humans are creatures of habit and a majority of our students and teachers are well familiar with the traditional style of lectures, a one-way communication, where the teacher is doing the talking and the rests sits quiet and listens. Leijon (2006) emphasize this and mean that both students and teachers have agency and use these affordances during their meaning making processes.

Sometimes this style of teaching is suitable and also necessary. At such occasions a traditional setup could work just fine. However, in the future I will be more careful with the choice of setting when I make plans for upcoming courses, depending on teaching activity. Classrooms with moveable chairs and tables becomes versatile in that respect, but also demands that you as a teacher actively rearrange the room depending on the character of the activity. It is essential to realise that the actual environment is an important factor to consider when planning for an activity, both for face to face teaching as well as for online teaching.

Our workshop in and about Zoom was mostly focusing on the technical part, how to set up breakout rooms and how to use other tools within the program. I would have liked to have more discussions concerning students learning in these different environments.

When it comes to implementing and using new technology in our courses it is clear that we must overcome several hurdles. First of all, we must know what different types of digital resources that exits. Secondly, we then need to learn how to use the tools we consider implementing in our courses. Finally, we must reflect upon how such digital tools can contribute to and improve students’ learning. I agree with Laurillard (2013) who mean that the purpose of education must lead the way and that we have to consider how we can use new digital technology as a support.

I use Zoom and a flipped classroom approach in my physics course for distant teacher students. Students own questions are supposed to be in focus during our digital meetings. My experience is that some students are well prepared for these meetings, while others are not. I have noticed that I get fewer spontaneous questions, where students make links between their everyday life experience and the physics content, compared to campus students, who I teach the same course but in a more traditional way. In that respect I concur with Jensen, Kummer and Godoy (2015) who’s study resulted in no higher learning gains for the flipped classroom approach compared to the nonflipped. Perhaps the pre-recorded lectures become too dominant in my distant course. One solution could be to give the distant students new content rich problems to discuss during our digital meetings and take advantage of the breakout room function to encourage students to interact more.

References

Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. M. (2015). Article improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-L fe Sciences Education, 14, 1–12.

Laurillard, D. (2013) Teaching as a Design Science. Routledge.

Leijon, M. (2016). Space as designs for and in learning: investigating the interplay between space, interaction and learning sequences in higher education. Visual Communication, vol. 15(1), s. 93-124.

 

 

 

1,396 thoughts on “Reflections after meeting 2”

  1. Fantastic reflections, Jan. Thank you! I agree that the focus in the Zoom session was dominated by the technical issues. As you write regarding “new” teaching technology, we first of all need to know about it. Then we need to know the technicalities and THEN we can focus on the pedagogical use cases and issues, I guess. As I mentioned in the course introduction, one challenge in the course, as in many
    other courses, is that we have so different previous knowledge especially when it comes to online teaching, and you obviously have done and know a lot in that respect. Your blog post hopefully serves for continuing discussions on that matter. I would also highly recommend you to participate in one of the upcoming sessions of the Open Networked Learning course: https://www.opennetworkedlearning.se in which we dive even deeper in the online aspects as we can in AUPU2. See you next week, Jörg

    Reply

  632. farmacia encargos online [url=https://confiapharma.com/#]comprar paracetamol 1g sin receta[/url] cГіdigo descuento farmacia online 24 pm

    Reply

  1235. This is amazing! Thank you for sharing – your work is truly inspiring. Your talent shines through in everything you create! HRM assignment help is a practical solution for students facing difficulties in understanding or completing their coursework.

    Reply

  1236. Understanding the theories and concepts of HNC course and then accurately completing off academic assignment jobs is absolutely an impractical task for numerous students. Practically all the students find themselves stressed and under pressure every time they have to finish the assignment jobs within the specified time. However, you require not being concerned. It is forever suggested to explore no more for professional tutors help as HNC Assignment Help is your best choice.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *